20 Best Video Editing Companies in 2026, With Prices and Turnaround

The 20 best video editing companies in 2026, rechecked on their own sites in September: published prices, stated turnaround and the model each one sells, from monthly editing services to award-winning commercial post houses.

Collage of leading video editing company homepages

A video editing company takes the footage you shot and hands back finished videos, and the right one depends on how often you publish and how much the edit has to carry. For weekly YouTube and social edits, a monthly editing service is the usual answer: published prices start at $495 a month (Vidchops), and most promise one to three business days per video. For a broadcast commercial you want a post house such as Cut+Run or Work Editorial, which bids per project and puts a named editor on the cut. Between the two sit creative teams that package editing with design and motion. I work at Moonb, one of those teams and the first entry below, so read that entry as a company describing itself.

Search for a video editing company and the results mash three different purchases together. The editing services work through your raw footage on a weekly rhythm, while a creative partner folds editing into a bigger production or design engagement. Post houses sit apart from both, cutting commercials with editors whose names end up in the credits and on awards lists. These groups rarely compete for the same job and their prices barely overlap, so knowing which one you are shopping for matters more than any single name below.

I rechecked all twenty against their own sites in September 2026: whether each is still operating, how it charges (per video, per credit, per hour or per month), the turnaround it promises and the clients it names. Where a company does not say, I write “not publicly stated” instead of guessing. One entry changed since the last update. Demo Duck is a good studio, but it makes explainer videos and this list is about editing, so it made way for beCreatives, a monthly editing service. If you would rather do the editing yourself, my guide to the best video editing software covers the tools, and the video editing cost guide explains what drives a quote.

If you only want the numbers:

  • Lowest published monthly prices: Vidchops from $495, Video Husky from $549, Veedyou from $899, VidPros from $1,000 and beCreatives from $1,199 on monthly billing.
  • Pay as you go: Video Husky credits cost $45 each in bundles from $225, and beCreatives sells a single test video for $89. Tasty Edits charges $327 per horizontal video, less in packages.
  • Fastest stated turnaround: same day on Vidchops’ full-time editor option, one day on beCreatives Pro and on Tasty Edits’ vertical videos, and one to two days on Vidchops’ credit plans, VidPros and Veedyou Growth (with overnight revisions at VidPros).
  • The top end: Superside starts at $15,000 a month on an annual term, while none of the eight post houses publishes a rate or a turnaround, because each one bids per project.

The 20 best video editing companies

1. Moonb

Moonb homepage screenshot

Moonb is where I work: an embedded creative team with a dedicated Creative Director plus video, motion, design and animation people who stay on your brand from one request to the next. Editing arrives alongside the rest of your creative, so a cutdown and its animated end card come from the same people.

  • Best for: brands that need steady editing plus design and motion from one team that already knows them
  • Pricing: one set monthly rate, or a per-project quote
  • Turnaround: most deliverables come back in about 48 hours, and complex productions take longer
  • Clients they name: Dell, Toyota, Nestle
  • Model: embedded team with a dedicated Creative Director, ongoing
  • Review signal: 4.9 on Clutch
More on Moonb
Where it shines: the edit is made by the team that shapes the rest of your brand, so nothing needs re-explaining, and one Creative Director checks all of it.
Where it falls short: for a backlog of talking-head footage that only needs trimming, the editing services below cost less per video, and for a single broadcast commercial the post houses go deeper on craft.

Not publicly stated: footage or video-length caps.

2. Vidchops

Vidchops homepage screenshot

Vidchops is a monthly editing service built around YouTube creators and sold in credits, where one credit buys either one long-form video of 5 to 60 minutes or four shorts. Its pricing page lists two plans plus a full-time editor option, and every plan includes a dedicated editor.

  • Best for: creators and small businesses publishing every week who want editing fully off their plate
  • Pricing: Weekly $495 a month for 4 credits, Pro $995 a month for 8 credits; subtitles $95 a month extra; the full-time editor option is priced on a call
  • Turnaround: 1 to 2 days per video, revisions in 1 business day
  • Clients they name: Brian G. Johnson, Grant Baldwin (The Speaker Lab), Nerdarchy, Dr. Vanita Rattan
  • Model: monthly credits that do not roll over, no contract, 14-day money-back guarantee
More on Vidchops
Where it shines: prices are published and the delivery rhythm is fast and predictable enough for a creator schedule. Its FAQ also includes two vertical versions of each edit at no extra cost.
Where it falls short: its FAQ caps finished videos at 15 minutes and rules out voiceovers and 2D or 3D animation. Credits also expire at month end, so a slow month is money you do not get back.

Not publicly stated: the full-time editor price.

3. Video Husky

Video Husky homepage screenshot

Video Husky pairs each client with an editor and an account manager, and says it has edited 16,043 videos for 812 creators. Besides four monthly packages named after dog breeds, it sells credit bundles that stay valid for six months, which helps if your schedule is irregular.

  • Best for: creators and small businesses who want the same editor on every video, on a monthly package or prepaid credits
  • Pricing: packages at $549, $849, $1,590 and $2,749 a month; credit bundles from $225 for five credits ($45 each), where a short costs one credit and a basic edit up to 20 minutes costs two
  • Turnaround: first draft in 1 to 3 business days, revisions in 1 day; it says 97.5 percent of requests take 2 business days or less
  • Clients they name: no brand logos; homepage testimonials come from individual creators and small businesses
  • Model: monthly package, or prepaid credits valid for six months
More on Video Husky
Where it shines: you get an editor backed by an account manager, and because both the packages and the credits have published prices, a quiet quarter can run on credits instead of a monthly package.
Where it falls short: its FAQ says the team works on one video at a time, so a sudden batch of ten sits in a queue. The service is also built for creator content more than for brand campaign work.

Not publicly stated: a client logo list.

4. Tasty Edits

Tasty Edits homepage screenshot

Tasty Edits sells editing by the video, and the price per video drops as the package gets bigger. It is built mainly for YouTube creators, podcasters and small businesses. Its founder, Alex Lefkowitz, started it in early 2020, and its about page lists more than 50 team members and more than 30,000 videos edited. Orders run through its own dashboard, VOMA, where you upload footage, message your editor and review drafts.

  • Best for: YouTube creators, podcasters and small teams who want long-form edits and vertical cuts without a monthly plan
  • Pricing: $327 per horizontal video, or $278 each in an 8-video package; vertical videos from $94, or $80 each in a 30-video package; thumbnails and vertical reformats are $43 add-ons
  • Turnaround: 48 hours for horizontal videos and 24 hours for vertical videos, per its pricing page
  • Clients they name: Laura Clery, Institute of Human Anatomy, Metatron, Dan Leeman, John O’Leary
  • Model: pay per video in packages, plus YouTube channel management from $1,490 a month billed quarterly
More on Tasty Edits
Where it shines: you pay for the videos you send and nothing in a quiet month, and the pricing page says the same editor and video manager stay on your orders, with color correction, music and stock footage included.
Where it falls short: the clients it names are YouTube creators and small organizations, so a brand campaign or a broadcast edit is better placed with one of the post houses further down this list.

Not publicly stated: raw footage limits or a maximum video length on its pricing page.

5. VidPros

VidPros homepage screenshot

VidPros sells editing by the hour, with a dedicated part-time or full-time editor working your queue for a set monthly price. Its homepage now also pitches white-label editing to agencies, delivered under the agency’s own brand.

  • Best for: channels and small businesses with enough steady volume to keep one editor busy
  • Pricing: Part Time $1,000 a month (about 40 hours), Full Time $4,000 a month (about 160 hours), plus a $100 trial week that converts into the $1,000 plan
  • Turnaround: 1 to 2 days, with overnight revisions on videos sent by the end of the US business day
  • Clients they name: Jessica Stansberry, Drew Brashler, Paul Reiser (a Sonic Drive-In franchise owner)
  • Model: editor hours billed monthly, cancel anytime
More on VidPros
Where it shines: the monthly cost is easy to predict and the trial week gives you a low-risk way to test an editor. For US teams that brief at the end of the day, the overnight rhythm fits well.
Where it falls short: the team works Tuesday to Saturday on Philippine hours, which limits live same-day collaboration, and buying hours tells you little about how many finished videos you will get.

Not publicly stated: expected output per plan in finished videos.

6. beCreatives

beCreatives homepage screenshot

beCreatives is a monthly editing service that gives each client a dedicated editing team and a request portal it calls SPACE, with a strong lean toward Reels, TikTok and YouTube. It says it has more than 100 monthly clients and 50,000 videos edited, and it is one of the few services here that sells a single test video before any plan.

  • Best for: brands and creators publishing short-form most days who want the same editors every time
  • Pricing: Scale $1,199, Pro $2,299 and In House Team $6,000 a month on monthly billing; less when billed quarterly (Scale is $2,997 every three months); one test video for $89
  • Turnaround: 2 to 3 business days on Scale, 1 day on Pro; short videos in as little as one business day
  • Clients they name: Canyon Ranch, Jenna Kutcher, Jeff Walker, Google
  • Model: monthly or quarterly plan, one request at a time on Scale and Pro
More on beCreatives
Where it shines: an $89 test video lets you judge the editing before you commit, and the one-day turnaround on Pro is among the fastest published anywhere on this list.
Where it falls short: the Scale plan allows two brands and two users, and Scale and Pro work on one request at a time (only In House Team takes simultaneous requests), so the volume you get depends on the tier far more than on the headline price.

Not publicly stated: where the editing team is based.

7. Veedyou Media

Veedyou homepage screenshot

Veedyou is a Bucharest editing shop that Cristian Stanciu started in 2017, and its “worked with” wall reaches well past the creator world to Cisco and DHL. It sells two monthly plans and a paid trial week.

  • Best for: small businesses and creators who want monthly editing from a shop with corporate references
  • Pricing: Starter $899 a month (up to 5 long-form or 15 short-form videos), Growth $2,399 a month (up to 15 long-form or 50 short-form); trial week $159
  • Turnaround: 2 to 3 business days on Starter, 1 to 2 on Growth
  • Clients they name: Cisco, DHL, Maxxis, RumbleOn
  • Model: monthly plan, no contract
More on Veedyou
Where it shines: corporate logos at small-shop prices with no cap on raw footage length. The trial week covers one long-form video or four reels, so you can see the work before paying for a full month.
Where it falls short: Starter works on one video at a time and its volume estimates assume 5 to 10 minute runtimes. The FAQ also quotes a slower standard turnaround of 7 to 10 days, with a 48-hour rush option, so ask which one applies to your plan.

Not publicly stated: prices for custom plans.

8. Kimp

Kimp homepage screenshot

Kimp folds video editing into a design service billed monthly, where a dedicated team and project manager handle both graphics and video. It is aimed at marketing teams that need a constant flow of social-ready output.

  • Best for: teams that want social video and graphics from one group under one monthly cost
  • Pricing: Video $1,397 a month, Graphics + Video $1,697 a month, month to month (its pricing page showed half price for the first four months when I checked)
  • Turnaround: on average one 30 to 60 second animated video every 24 hours, or one 10-minute edit every 2 to 4 business days
  • Clients they name: Decathlon, Harley Davidson, London Real
  • Model: monthly plan with two video requests in progress at a time
More on Kimp
Where it shines: a monthly cost with no surprises, and design and video coming from one team with a project manager in the middle.
Where it falls short: its FAQ limits video edits to one hour in length and other video types to three minutes, and the team assigned to you puts roughly 2 to 2.5 hours a day into your video requests. That setup favours templated social volume over bespoke editing. My colleague's Kimp pricing breakdown has the plan detail.

Not publicly stated: a guaranteed number of finished videos per month.

9. Vidico

Vidico homepage screenshot

Vidico makes video for tech brands, and editing comes bundled into that production work. It is one of the few production companies to print prices on its own site, and it lists offices in Melbourne, Sydney, New York, Dubai and Singapore.

  • Best for: software companies that want editing attached to ongoing original production
  • Pricing: monthly plans from $5,000 with unused budget rolling over; explainers from $5,000 to $20,000 and up
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Spotify, Square, Airtable, DigitalOcean, Zendesk, Klaviyo
  • Model: per project, or a monthly plan
More on Vidico
Where it shines: published price ranges and a monthly plan where unused budget rolls over, backed by a tech client list few production companies can match.
Where it falls short: you are buying production with editing inside it, which is a heavy route when all you need is your existing footage cut. The $5,000 monthly floor also takes steady production to justify.

Not publicly stated: turnaround, plan tiers above $5,000.

10. Superside

Superside homepage screenshot

Superside delivers editing through its managed creative team, as one discipline inside a design-led service that also covers ads, branding and web. Its pricing page spells out the commitment it expects.

  • Best for: large marketing organisations that want editing capacity inside a broad, always-on creative retainer
  • Pricing: $15,000 a month minimum on an annual term plus a $1,000 monthly software fee; dedicated teams from $30,000 a month
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Amazon, Colgate, Reddit, Figma, Microsoft, Coinbase
  • Model: creative-as-a-service, annual commitment
More on Superside
Where it shines: a large creative bench behind the editors, and pricing clear enough to take to procurement without a call.
Where it falls short: the entry point is roughly $192,000 a year with no month-to-month option, and video is one service among many. My Superside pricing guide has the full picture.

Not publicly stated: turnaround, cancellation terms.

11. Sandwich

Sandwich homepage screenshot

Sandwich describes itself as a Los Angeles video production company that makes launch and explainer films for technology companies. Its homepage opens with “We make commercials”, its reel mixes TV spots with explainers, and the edit is part of the finished film it sells.

  • Best for: tech and software brands after a premium, story-led product film
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; quoted per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Slack, Airbnb, Square, Perplexity, Descript, Rubrik
  • Model: per project
More on Sandwich
Where it shines: launch films that make a complicated product click, with cinematic production values and TV spots on the reel.
Where it falls short: it sells finished films, so footage you already shot and need cut every week belongs somewhere else.

Not publicly stated: prices, timelines.

12. Lemonlight

Lemonlight homepage screenshot

Lemonlight is a full-service production company built to be one repeatable partner for a brand’s video, with crews covering more than 80 cities and more than 50,000 videos produced. Editing comes packaged inside its production engagements.

  • Best for: brands that need volume production across many locations from one managed partner
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; quoted per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated beyond a promise of quick turnarounds
  • Clients they name: Amazon, Google, Walmart, Coca-Cola, Airbnb
  • Model: per project, or Lemonlight Pro for ongoing work
More on Lemonlight
Where it shines: crew reach across many cities and a productised process that scales from one video to a steady slate.
Where it falls short: if your footage already exists, most of what you pay for is production capacity you will not use.

Not publicly stated: prices, turnaround times, Lemonlight Pro terms.

13. Cut+Run

Cut+Run homepage screenshot

Cut+Run is where the list changes gear: a commercial editorial company founded in Soho in 1997, now cutting from London, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco and Austin. Every spot on its homepage credits the individual editor, which tells you how this end of the market is bought.

  • Best for: agency-grade commercial editing from a named, experienced editor
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; bid per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Toyota, Microsoft, Progressive, ESPN, AT&T
  • Model: per project, offline editorial with a VFX partner
More on Cut+Run
Where it shines: nearly three decades of commercial craft, and you choose the individual editor whose reel you like.
Where it falls short: its traditional bid-per-project model is priced for commercial production, which makes it an expensive home for a steady flow of content edits.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

14. Union Editorial

Union Editorial homepage screenshot

Union Editorial lists 27 editors on its site, working across Los Angeles and New York. Its Union Entertainment arm shows work for Netflix, and the site lists design and VFX and audio teams alongside the editors.

  • Best for: premium commercial and streaming editing from a large roster
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; bid per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Heineken, Hyundai, Walmart, Netflix, Cisco
  • Model: per project, with audio and VFX in-house
More on Union Editorial
Where it shines: a large editor roster in two cities, with sound and visual effects handled under the same roof.
Where it falls short: it is priced and scheduled for commercial production, and nothing on the site hints at rates or timelines.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

15. Whitehouse Post

Whitehouse Post homepage screenshot

Whitehouse Post is an independent editing company with more than 30 years behind it and offices in London, New York, Chicago and Los Angeles. Its partner companies, Carbon for visual effects and motion and The Lemonade Stand for production, sit close by for anything beyond the cut.

  • Best for: blue-chip commercial editing with VFX and production partners nearby
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; bid per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: KFC, Samsung, Volkswagen, Ford, Coca-Cola
  • Model: per project
More on Whitehouse Post
Where it shines: decades of pedigree across four cities, with Carbon and The Lemonade Stand on hand when a job grows past the edit.
Where it falls short: it is built around agency and brand commercials, which makes it a poor fit for a weekly content queue.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

16. Trim Editing

Trim Editing homepage screenshot

Trim is a London editing house with offices in Los Angeles and New York, and its roster includes Mikkel E.G. Nielsen, who won the Academy Award for editing Sound of Metal (per Wikipedia). Its homepage runs from Nike World Cup 2026 work to spots for OpenAI and Squarespace.

  • Best for: craft-first commercial and music-video editing
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Nike, Apple, Burberry, Netflix, OpenAI
  • Model: per project, credited alongside the director, production company and agency
More on Trim Editing
Where it shines: an Oscar-winning editor on the roster and current work for some of the biggest advertisers there are.
Where it falls short: it sells editing craft alone, with no design or motion around it. Its credits also run through major agencies and production companies, which points to commercial-scale fees.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

17. Final Cut

Final Cut homepage screenshot

Final Cut (the editing company, not Apple’s software) cuts commercials and music videos as well as feature films, working out of London, New York and Los Angeles. In 2026 its editor Jeff Buchanan won a Silver Lion in Editing at Cannes for On’s “Shape of Dreams”, and its news page also reports Edit House of the Year and Editor of the Year wins at the shots awards.

  • Best for: brand films for fashion and luxury names, cut at the highest craft level
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Chanel, Prada, Gucci, Apple, Airbnb
  • Model: per project
More on Final Cut
Where it shines: fresh awards from Cannes Lions and shots, and directors such as Spike Jonze and Alfonso Cuarón on its credits.
Where it falls short: a high-end per-project house that publishes neither prices nor turnaround commitments.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

18. Work Editorial

Work Editorial homepage screenshot

Work Editorial was founded in 2006 by three London film editors and an executive producer, and now has offices in London, New York and Los Angeles. Its news page reports that it was named Edit House of the Year at the Ad Age Creativity Awards for the second year running in 2026, along with a 2026 Cannes Lions Grand Prix in Pharma for editing on Novartis’s Super Bowl campaign and two Emmy nominations for commercials.

  • Best for: campaign editing from a house the trade awards keep naming
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Apple, adidas, Novartis
  • Model: per project
More on Work Editorial
Where it shines: back-to-back Ad Age wins plus Cannes Lions and Emmy recognition in 2026, spread across several of its editors.
Where it falls short: work is booked per project, so a single campaign suits it far better than a steady content stream.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

19. Arcade Edit

Arcade Edit homepage screenshot

Arcade Edit is a commercial post house with editing, color, AI and VFX finishing under one roof. Its brand list is made up largely of national advertisers, and its agency list runs from 72andSunny to Wieden & Kennedy and BBDO.

  • Best for: commercial campaigns that want the edit, color and finishing handled in one building
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; bid per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Samsung, Coca-Cola, Toyota, Target, T-Mobile, Intel
  • Model: per project
More on Arcade Edit
Where it shines: a client list of household-name advertisers, plus AI listed as a service next to its color and finishing work.
Where it falls short: pricing is bid per project for commercial production, and no rates appear anywhere on the site.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

20. MakeMake (Rock Paper Scissors)

MakeMake homepage screenshot

MakeMake is the studio that grew out of Rock Paper Scissors, the editorial company founded in 1992 (rockpaperscissors.com now points to MakeMake’s editing page). In 2023 it folded Rock Paper Scissors, a52, Elastic and its other companies into one studio. Rock Paper Scissors was started by editor Angus Wall with Linda Carlson, and Wall shared two Academy Awards for film editing (per Wikipedia).

  • Best for: the very top of commercial and music-video editing, where the editor is a named craftsperson
  • Pricing: not publicly stated; bid per project
  • Turnaround: not publicly stated
  • Clients they name: Apple, Nike, Google, Chanel, Amazon
  • Model: per project, with design, VFX, color and music in-house
More on MakeMake
Where it shines: a twice Oscar-winning co-founder, and every post-production craft inside one studio.
Where it falls short: elite editing priced for agency and brand productions, and the Rock Paper Scissors name you may have searched for now lives under MakeMake.

Not publicly stated: rates, turnaround.

Which kind of editing company fits your situation

The twenty sit on three shelves, and your situation chooses the shelf before you ever compare names.

  • You have footage piling up and need it cut every week. Look at the editing services: Vidchops, Video Husky, Tasty Edits, VidPros, beCreatives and Veedyou. Compare their published prices with your monthly volume, and read the limits before you commit.
  • You need editing plus the creative around it. That points to Moonb, Kimp, Vidico, Superside, Sandwich or Lemonlight, matched in that order to brand consistency, social volume, tech production, a large annual retainer, a premium product film or shoots in many cities. You are paying for a team, and the edit is one part of what it makes.
  • You are cutting a commercial and the edit will make or break it. Go to the post houses: Cut+Run, Union, Whitehouse, Trim, Final Cut, Work, Arcade and MakeMake. Here the editor is what you are buying, so shortlist the person whose reel moves you first and the company around them second.
  • Whichever shelf you land on, watch the caps and the clocks. Editing services publish limits, such as a 15-minute ceiling on finished videos or one video in progress at a time, and those limits decide more about your month than the headline price. Post houses publish nothing, so the bid rises and falls with how complex the cut is.

For a feel of what you pay for at the craft end, Crash Course’s episode on the editor is eleven minutes well spent. It walks through how an edit builds meaning shot by shot, and once you have seen it, the gap between trimming footage and real editorial work stops being abstract.

Four ways editing gets priced, and which one fits your schedule

Matching the pricing model to how often you publish saves more money than chasing the lowest number on a pricing page.

  • Per minute of finished video. You will mostly meet this with freelancers and one-off post jobs, and it is fair for a piece of known length. None of the twenty prices strictly by the minute, though Video Husky’s credits come close, with a short of up to 60 seconds costing one credit and a basic edit of up to 20 minutes costing two. If Fiverr is where this search started, our rundown of where to hire a freelance video editor compares it with Upwork and the other marketplaces.
  • Per video. Tasty Edits works this way, at $327 per horizontal video or $278 each in an 8-video package, and beCreatives sells a single test video for $89. Because an empty month costs nothing, paying per video suits an irregular schedule, and it is the safest way to judge a service before you commit to anything longer.
  • Monthly. Vidchops, Video Husky, Veedyou, beCreatives and Kimp sell monthly capacity, counted in credits, videos or requests in progress, and VidPros sells the hourly version of the same idea. The maths only works if you use what you pay for: Vidchops’ $495 plan comes to about $124 per long-form video when all four credits get used, and every credit that expires pushes that figure up.
  • Bid per project. Every post house here quotes the job in front of it. Have the script or board, the running length, the number of versions and the delivery date ready, because those four things decide the bid.

If you publish less than once a week, paying per video keeps the quiet months free. From weekly upward, a monthly plan usually lands at a lower cost per finished video, and for a commercial the only real benchmark is a second bid. If you are weighing a hire against any of these, our guide on how to hire a video editor walks through scoping the role and running a paid test.

Where I see buyers overpay or under-buy

  1. Sending commercial work to an editing service. A $495 monthly plan will technically cut your brand film, and the result will look like a $495 cut. These services are built for talking-head and social volume, and campaign craft is a different job.
  2. Hiring a post house for weekly content. This inverse mistake costs even more, because bid-per-project pricing on a steady content stream burns money on work an editing service or an embedded team would handle for a fraction of the cost.
  3. Ignoring the fine print on volume plans. A 15-minute cap on finished videos at Vidchops, or a one-video queue on Veedyou’s Starter plan, decides what a month of editing gets you. Both limits are published, just further down the page than the price.
  4. Committing before a test edit. VidPros sells a $100 trial week, Veedyou a $159 one and beCreatives an $89 single video. Send real footage with a real brief and judge the result before you sign up for a quarter.
  5. Buying editing when the problem is the footage. No editor rescues material that was never planned, so if every edit disappoints, the fix usually sits upstream in the brief and the shoot. That is an argument for a partner over a pure editing service.

All twenty in one table

#CompanyBest forPricingTurnaroundModel
1MoonbEditing inside ongoing creativeOne set monthly rate, or a per-project quoteAbout 48 hours for most deliverablesEmbedded team
2VidchopsWeekly creator editing$495 to $995/mo1 to 2 daysMonthly credits
3Video HuskySame editor on every video$549 to $2,749/mo; credits from $451 to 3 business daysMonthly package or credits
4Tasty EditsIrregular publishing schedules$327 per horizontal video, $94 per vertical video, lower in packages48 hours horizontal, 24 hours verticalPay per video in packages
5VidProsA steady queue for one editor$1,000 or $4,000/mo1 to 2 daysEditor hours, monthly
6beCreativesDaily short-form$1,199 to $6,000/mo; $89 test video1 to 3 business daysMonthly or quarterly plan
7VeedyouMonthly editing, corporate references$899 to $2,399/mo1 to 3 business daysMonthly plan
8KimpSocial video plus graphics$1,397/mo; $1,697 with graphics24 hours to 4 business daysMonthly plan
9VidicoTech brands, editing inside productionPlans from $5,000/moNot statedProject or monthly plan
10SupersideLarge always-on creative programmes$15,000/mo minimum + $1,000 feeNot statedAnnual commitment
11SandwichPremium tech product filmsNot statedNot statedPer project
12LemonlightVolume production, many locationsNot statedNot statedProject or Lemonlight Pro
13Cut+RunAgency-grade commercialsBid per projectNot statedPer project
14Union EditorialLarge-roster commercial editingBid per projectNot statedPer project
15Whitehouse PostBlue-chip commercial craftBid per projectNot statedPer project
16Trim EditingCraft-first commercialsBid per projectNot statedPer project
17Final CutLuxury and brand filmsBid per projectNot statedPer project
18Work EditorialAward-season campaign workBid per projectNot statedPer project
19Arcade EditCommercials with color and finishingBid per projectNot statedPer project
20MakeMake (RPS)Top-tier named-editor editorialBid per projectNot statedPer project
Related services
Social Media Video ProductionPharmaceutical VideoProduct Demo Video Production
See more from Moonb in your Google results

Frequently asked questions

Mostly it depends on how the company charges. Monthly editing services with published prices start around $500 a month for a handful of long-form videos and climb into the low thousands for more volume or a dedicated editor. Credits and pay-per-video options suit irregular schedules, and some services sell a single test edit for under $100. Commercial post houses bid per project and publish no rates, so to price a broadcast edit you send your script and delivery date and ask for a bid.

A freelancer can cost less and works well for a one-off project, as long as you have the time to brief the editor and then review and chase the edit yourself. A video editing company gives you cover when your editor is away and usually a stated turnaround, both of which start to matter once you publish every week. What decides it is who manages the work: if nobody on your team has that time, a company earns its higher price.

Send two or three finished videos you like, with a line on what works in each, plus your logo files and the fonts and colors your brand uses. Put the raw footage for each video in its own folder and flag the best takes so your editor does not spend time hunting through clips. A short written brief saying where the video will run and how long it should be removes most of the first round of revisions.

You may also like

All posts
6 October 2025

20 Best Product Video Companies in 2026

Video Production
10 December 2025

How To Make An Advertising Video (A Practical Guide)

Strategy
5 August 2026

How to Choose the Best Social Media Marketing Agency in 2026

Marketing
5 November 2025

The 43 Best Corporate Video Production Companies in 2026

Video Production

Ready to level up your creative?

Tell us what you're working on and we'll take it from there.

Book a Call